The Biggest SR&ED Claims in Canadian History — And What Founders Can Learn
From Bombardier's $2.4B monster to BlackBerry's $500M annual filings, here's what the largest SR&ED claims in Canadian history reveal about eligibility, documentation, and scale.
The $2.4 billion claim that made history
In 2013, Bombardier filed what is widely reported as the largest SR&ED claim in Canadian history: approximately $2.4 billion in qualifying research and development expenditures, aggregated across multiple subsidiaries and fiscal years. The claim covered the development of the CSeries aircraft — now the Airbus A220 — including aerodynamic modeling, composite wing design, fly-by-wire avionics, and engine integration.
The claim wasn't a single document. It was a portfolio of claims across multiple fiscal years, multiple subsidiaries, and multiple R&D programs. Bombardier's dedicated tax team — one of the largest in Canada — maintained contemporaneous documentation for every phase of development, from initial concept through flight testing.
What CRA approved: the systematic investigation documented in design reviews, wind tunnel test logs, flight test data, and engineering change records. What CRA scrutinized: the allocation of overhead and administrative costs, the boundary between qualifying R&D and commercial engineering, and the consistency of documentation across multiple claim years.
The lesson for small founders: Bombardier's claim was large, but the criteria were the same. Systematic investigation. Contemporaneous documentation. Clear technical narratives. A $50K claim from a startup faces the same fundamental review as a $2.4B claim from an aerospace giant.
BlackBerry's $500M annual claim machine
At its peak in the early 2010s, BlackBerry (then Research In Motion) reportedly filed annual SR&ED claims in the hundreds of millions. Industry reporting has cited figures approaching $500 million in aggregate claims across subsidiaries and fiscal years. The claims covered BlackBerry's core R&D: secure messaging architecture, mobile operating system development, battery optimization, and the encryption systems that made BlackBerry the device of choice for government and enterprise users.
BlackBerry's Waterloo headquarters employed over 4,000 engineers at its peak. Their R&D documentation was institutionalized: every project had a technical mandate, every sprint had technical objectives, and every major decision was recorded in architecture decision records. The SR&ED claim process was essentially an annual compilation of documentation that the engineering team produced as a byproduct of normal work.
The Waterloo effect: BlackBerry's scale created an ecosystem of SR&ED expertise. The CPAs, tax lawyers, and technical writers who worked on BlackBerry's claims went on to serve the broader Waterloo tech community. When BlackBerry declined, that expertise didn't disappear — it diffused into the startups that now populate the Waterloo Region.
The pharmaceutical claims nobody talks about
Pharmaceutical companies consistently file the largest SR&ED claims in Canada. Companies like Pfizer Canada, AstraZeneca Canada, and Apotex file claims in the hundreds of millions annually, covering drug development, clinical trials, and manufacturing process innovation.
But the pharmaceutical claims that interest small founders are the biotech startups: companies like Zymeworks (Vancouver), which developed novel antibody therapeutics and filed SR&ED claims during its pre-revenue development phase, or AbCellera (also Vancouver), which built a single-cell screening platform for antibody discovery.
Zymeworks, founded in 2003, filed SR&ED claims for over a decade before achieving commercial revenue. The credits funded continued R&D through multiple clinical trial phases. In 2021, the company was acquired by Jazz Pharmaceuticals for approximately $1.9 billion. Companies of this scale and R&D intensity typically claim significant SR&ED credits — though Zymeworks has not publicly disclosed the specific amounts claimed.
What massive claims teach small founders
The largest claims in Canadian history share three characteristics that any founder can replicate:
- Documentation as culture, not as compliance. Bombardier and BlackBerry didn't document for SR&ED. They documented because their engineering process required it. SR&ED was a byproduct, not a burden.
- Clear technical narratives with specific evidence. Every major claim references specific documents, test results, and design records. Not 'we did R&D.' But 'we tested 40 wing configurations in the wind tunnel, documented why 37 failed, and developed the swept-wing design documented in ADR-WNG-2012-042.'
- Proportionate claim size. Bombardier's $2.4B claim was proportionate to their $10B+ R&D investment. A startup's $50K claim is proportionate to their $150K R&D investment. CRA evaluates proportionality, not absolute size.
The founders who build these habits from day one — the weekly logs, the technical decision records, the explicit project scoping — create claims that scale with their company. A 3-person startup with perfect documentation files a $30K claim in year one, a $120K claim in year two, and a $400K claim in year three. The habit compounds.
Company figures are sourced from publicly available annual reports, press releases, and industry analyses. This guide provides general educational context. Specific claim advice requires consultation with a qualified CPA. Learn more at sredy.io.
Turn this guide into a claim package
SREDY.IO walks you through eligibility, project narratives, supporting costs, and evidence so your CPA has a cleaner file to review.
More guides
CRA Approved $3.1 Billion in SR&ED Last Year. Here's What That Means for Your Claim.
Canada's SR&ED program is one of the world's largest R&D tax incentives. But most of that $3.1B goes to a small subset of claimants. Here's the data — and how to join the winning group.
Costs & Financials10 SR&ED Facts That Will Make You File Tomorrow
Canadian tech companies leave an estimated $400 million in unclaimed SR&ED credits on the table every year. The average approved claim reportedly returns approximately $155,000. If you're not filing, you're essentially lighting money on fire.
EligibilityHow Much Would the NHL's Puck-Tracking Engineers Claim in SR&ED?
The NHL's puck-tracking system captures thousands of data points per game. Most fans think it's magic. It's actually a decade of painstaking R&D by Canadian companies like Sportlogiq and Stathletes — and it probably qualifies for millions in tax credits.
Ready to check if your work qualifies? Take the free eligibility assessment.
Check eligibility — free →